Intercourse of the fictive beginner try matched from the sexual orientation and you may pictures showed a virtually-up with a happy facial term (utilized from the Radboud Faces Databases
Participants framework: First 12 months treatments pupils (N = 355) was indeed allowed to participate an internet survey while in the a good lecture and you may by way of its digital studies guide. College students don’t found loans due to their contribution, but was informed that studies was part of its colloquium and that they was informed concerning contributes to a keen upcoming lecture. People conveyed the dating standing because sometimes solitary or in an personal relationships, where 87 (38%) was indeed when you look at the a personal relationships and that excluded for additional analyses. This triggered a remaining sample regarding 138 respondents (pick Dining table step one, line try dos). Zero category variations in many years (F(step one,step one37) = 1.step three, p = .254, ? 2 = .009), gender (? dos (1) = 0.18, p = .676) otherwise relationship background (? 2 (2) = 6.0, p = .050) have been found ranging from participants about healthy against. the brand new malignant tumors condition in experiment dos.
The voluntary and you will unknown reputation of one’s data is actually explained on the internet and players had been informed you to because of the proceeding for the questionnaire, it shown their agree which have contribution. Players was questioned to indicate earliest market advice prior to they certainly were randomized toward match or cancer tumors standing (find Desk step 1, line try dos). These people were given a conclusion and you will image of a beneficial fictive fellow student. The male and you will females images had been chosen predicated on age (like the age of first 12 months students) and attractive appears. This new pupil is described as an extra year student one to introduced all assessments, had a part-time employment during the a theatre, lived in beginner housing, possibly visited their/her parents, was single but wants to get in a relationship. Immediately after answering multiple inquiries, respondents have been offered region dos of profile, presenting possibly a story towards fit position (missing flirtymature companion so you can cancer tumors three-years before) against. the newest cancers status (had malignant tumors your or herself 3 years before). The new Moral Panel of psychology agencies of College regarding Groningen, the netherlands, recognized regarding the analysis (ppo-015-082).
Parameters and you may strategies: Immediately following understanding the original part of the circumstance, respondents rated to the a visual analogue measure (zero (1)-sure (10)) whether they might be in search of a date using this people (first focus). Immediately after becoming randomized, they again ranked demand for a night out together, accompanied by evaluations of your own showed individual toward 10 attributes (i.elizabeth., fascinating, separate, insecure, friendly, healthy, educated, needy, comedy, fearless, strong) into a measure of 1–ten (definitely not-really). Eventually, all of the participants (and those in the healthy position) was requested when they desires understand a cancer reputation of a potential mate (i.e., till the date that is first, at the date that is first, after a couple of dates, in the event that relationship was felt personal).
Overall performance.
Hypothesis 1 2: less interest in cancer profile, especially in women: Univariate general linear model with condition (healthy vs. cancer) and gender as fixed factors and interest in a date as measured in part 2 (i.e., after cancer disclosure) as dependent variable was performed. We accounted for initial interest as measured in part 1 and entered it as covariate (initial interest and interest after second part of description correlated strongly, r = .86, p < .001). The overall model was significant (F(4,134) = 97.1; p < .001, ? 2 = .744), with initial interest (F(1,134) = 351.9, p < .001, ? 2 = .724) explaining almost all of the variance of dating interest; while main effects of gender (F(1, 134) = 0.46, p = .497, ? 2 = .003) and condition (F(1, 134) = 1.12, p = .292, ? 2 = .008), and their interaction (F(1, 134) = 2.69, p = .103, ? 2 = .020) were not significant (see Table 2 for means). Accordingly, a similar analysis without initial interest as covariate changed the overall results (F(3,135) = 3.4, p = .020, ? 2 = .070), with no significant main effect for condition (F(1, 135) = 1.01, p = .316, ? 2 = .007) or the interaction effect (F(1, 135) = 0.2, p = .211, ? 2 = .012). However, without accounting for initial interest, a significant yet small effect of gender was found, where men (M = 5.5, SD = .2.4) reported greater interest in a date overall than women (M = 4.3, SD = 2.4; F(1,135) = 8.1, p = .005, ? 2 = .057).
Comments are closed